How to choose
Four kinds of product wear the same label
"Lease abstraction software" covers four different purchases. Self-serve platforms your analysts operate. Extraction modules inside a property-management suite. APIs your engineers build pipelines on. And service firms that deliver finished abstracts, with software somewhere behind the curtain. Feature lists blur the difference; the deciding question is who reviews the output — your analysts, your suite administrators, your developers, or the vendor's staff.
Whatever the category, the same five criteria separate the tools. They are the columns in the comparison table below, and every one of them is a question a vendor should answer in plain terms.
Accuracy transparency
Most vendors publish a high accuracy number, ours included, and every such figure is the vendor's own measurement. The useful question is whether you can check a single value: does it carry a confidence rating and a reference to the page it came from, and will the vendor say how the headline number was measured?
Telecom and tower specialization
Tower portfolios are not office leases. Ground leases and tenant leases need different workflows, escalation clauses range from fixed annual percentages to CPI-linked formulas and multi-year step-ups, and a site's record is a chain of amendments. A generic schema can miss exactly the terms that price a tower.
Batch scale
A pilot is ten documents; a portfolio is thousands. Ask what an overnight run looks like in practice, and whether the cost of a portfolio-wide pass is visible before you submit it rather than on the invoice after.
Pricing model
Public plans let you budget before the first call; quote-only pricing means procurement before evidence. Check what a credit or a seat covers, what overage costs, and whether a trial exists.
Deployment
Standard cloud hosting suits most teams. Organizations with strict data requirements should ask whether the software can run in their own environment, and get the commitment that documents are never used to train AI models in writing.
The fastest way past everyone's marketing, ours included: shortlist two or three tools and run the same ten leases through each. Disagreements between the outputs will teach you more than any comparison page, this one included.
The list
Six options, compared
Ours is listed first and labeled as ours. The order is disclosure, not a ranking; competitor descriptions state what each vendor publicly documents, as of August 2026.
MYX Analyzer
MYX Analyzer is our product, so read this entry as the maker's case and judge it against the free demo rather than taking our word. It is a self-serve platform built around a spreadsheet-style grid: each row is a document, each column is a field defined by a plain-language prompt, and every extracted value carries a HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW confidence rating plus a reference to the page and section it came from. Measured extraction quality is 94.7 % on internal evaluation sets; the workflow still assumes your team verifies, and the references make each check a page lookup instead of a re-read. The full workflow is on the lease abstraction page.
The Analyzer extracts 500+ data fields in 40+ languages, and processes hundreds of documents overnight with enterprise batch processing — every batch run shows an upfront cost estimate before submission. It is built for infrastructure portfolios first: telecom tower lease abstraction has dedicated workflows, and in a single engagement the platform processed approximately 250,000 documents in under 48 hours, as reported in Inside Towers. Results export to Excel with custom templates; Pro and Business plans include API access, and there is a dedicated page on the MYX + Sitetracker integration.
Pricing is public: Pro at €99/month and Business at €999/month, with a 30-day free trial — details on the pricing page. MYX is ISO 27001 certified, customer documents are never used to train AI models, and for organizations with strict data requirements the platform can be deployed within the customer's own environment — see Security & GDPR.
Prophia
Prophia is an AI lease abstraction and portfolio intelligence platform for commercial real estate, founded in 2018. It ingests leases, amendments, and rent rolls, pairs AI extraction with optional human review, and adds portfolio tools such as stacking plans and tenant-rights tracking. Its customer base is institutional CRE: owners, investors, and asset managers.
MRI Contract Intelligence
MRI Contract Intelligence is the AI data-extraction product in MRI Software's real estate suite, built on the acquired Leverton platform. It combines OCR and AI to abstract leases and other contracts, supports IFRS 16 and ASC 842 lease-accounting workflows, and integrates with MRI's own property-management products. The natural fit is portfolios already running on MRI.
DocuPipe
DocuPipe is a developer-facing document extraction API that converts leases, among many other document types, into structured JSON against custom schemas. Its documentation covers visual reviews that highlight where each extracted field was sourced, and cloud, VPC, or on-premises deployment. It serves engineering teams building their own document pipelines, with real estate as one vertical among many.
Realogic
Realogic is a Chicago commercial real estate consulting firm, founded in 1992, that delivers lease abstraction as a service through an in-house team working on rAbstract, its own abstraction platform. Abstracts are delivered in the client's format, including Excel or direct input into accounting systems. Its clients are institutional investors, owners, and managers, often around transactions and due diligence.
RE BackOffice
RE BackOffice pairs abstraction software with vendor-side review: its published model is AI-assisted abstraction in which every abstract is checked by the firm's lease professionals before delivery. It also provides ongoing lease administration, which suits teams that want abstraction and administration handled by one provider.
At a glance
Comparison across the five criteria
A check mark means the vendor publicly documents the capability. A blank cell means we could not verify it either way from public sources — treat it as a question for the vendor, not as a no. A dash means the capability is verifiably not part of that product's model.
| Criterion | MYX Analyzer | Prophia | MRI Contract Intelligence | DocuPipe | Realogic | RE BackOffice |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Per-value source references | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Telecom & tower workflows | ✓ | |||||
| Self-serve batch processing | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Public pricing | ✓ | |||||
| Deployment in your own environment | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Vendor-side human review offered | — | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Compiled from vendor websites and public coverage, August 2026. The dash is ours: MYX Analyzer has no vendor-side review team by design — your own team reviews in the grid, guided by confidence ratings and source references.
Two honest notes on reading the table. First, blank does not mean absent; several of these vendors likely do more than they document publicly. Second, the criteria favor portfolios like the ones we serve — index-linked escalations you can model with the free lease escalation calculator, tower and infrastructure documents, due diligence volumes. An office landlord with fifty leases and an MRI back office would weight this table differently, and probably should.
FAQ
What is the best lease abstraction software?
There is no single best. The market splits into self-serve platforms (MYX Analyzer, Prophia), modules inside a property-management suite (MRI Contract Intelligence), developer APIs (DocuPipe), and service firms (Realogic, RE BackOffice). Match the category to whoever will review the output, then test a shortlist on your own leases. Most vendors, MYX included, offer a demo or trial for exactly that.
How accurate is AI lease abstraction software?
Published accuracy figures are vendor-measured, ours included: MYX Analyzer measures 94.7 % on internal evaluation sets. Treat every number in the category as a claim to verify, and prefer tools that let you check individual values. In the Analyzer, each extracted value carries a HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW confidence rating and a reference to the page of the source document it came from.
Should we buy abstraction software or hire an abstraction service?
A service fits a one-off deliverable, or questions of legal interpretation rather than extraction. Software fits portfolios where the questions keep coming: add a field next quarter and have the same documents read again for it, with every value still pointing at its source. Some teams combine the two. The lease abstraction page has a fuller software-versus-service comparison.
Test the first entry on the list
The claims above are ours to prove. Run the demo, or upload your own leases and check every extracted value against its confidence rating and source reference.
30-day free trial · Card required — first charge only when the trial ends · Cancel anytime
Prophia, MRI Contract Intelligence, Leverton, DocuPipe, Realogic, rAbstract, and RE BackOffice are trademarks of their respective owners. MYX (MYX AD) is not affiliated with or endorsed by any of those owners. Sitetracker is a trademark of Sitetracker, Inc. MYX (MYX AD) is not affiliated with or endorsed by Sitetracker, Inc. or Salesforce, Inc. Competitor descriptions summarize each vendor's own public materials as of August 2026; verify current capabilities with the vendor.